Innovation Portfolio¶
Matthew Martz, PhD
Executive Summary: Business Impact & Market Opportunity¶
The challenge of adapting AI models to specialized domains—healthcare, legal, finance, and scientific research—represents a $180B+ market opportunity where catastrophic forgetting prevents reliable production deployment. Organizations invest heavily in domain-specific AI but face a critical technical barrier: models lose general knowledge when adapted to specialized domains, creating unacceptable risk in high-stakes applications. My AdaptQ innovation solves this fundamental constraint, enabling organizations to deploy production AI systems that maintain both domain expertise and general reasoning—unlocking enterprise adoption across high-value, regulated industries where AI deployment has been technically infeasible.
Strategic Value: - Enables production AI deployment in previously inaccessible $180B+ high-divergence markets (healthcare, legal, finance, scientific research) - Eliminates catastrophic forgetting bottleneck preventing enterprise adoption - Delivers 967× improvement over current state-of-the-art (LoRA) at production scale - Patent-pending technology with significant IP value and competitive moat - Addresses critical business need: reliable domain adaptation without compromising model safety
AdaptQ: Solving Catastrophic Forgetting in High-Divergence Domains¶
Overview¶
I've developed the AdaptQ family of algorithms to address one of the most critical challenges in production AI deployment: catastrophic forgetting in low-rank parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) for high-divergence domains such as medicine, law, finance, and scientific research.
These high-divergence domains present unique challenges because their specialized vocabularies, knowledge structures, and reasoning patterns diverge significantly from the general text used in model pretraining. This large distribution shift makes it extraordinarily difficult to tune models for domain expertise while maintaining their general knowledge and reasoning capabilities. The challenge is particularly acute because these same high-divergence domains—healthcare, legal systems, financial services, and scientific research—are among the most critical areas where AI can drive innovation and deliver substantial societal benefits. Solving catastrophic forgetting in these domains is essential for realizing AI's potential to improve human welfare at scale.
This work represents a fundamental rethinking of how we adapt large language models to high-divergence domains while preserving their general capabilities.
The Problem: LoRA's Scale-Dependent Catastrophic Forgetting in High-Divergence Domains¶
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the dominant method for fine-tuning large language models, with widespread adoption across medical AI, legal tech, financial services, and scientific research domains. However, my research has uncovered a critical flaw that particularly affects high-divergence domains:
LoRA exhibits catastrophic forgetting at production scales, with a critical threshold at 100-150 training samples.
Key Findings on LoRA's Limitations:¶
- Safe zone (<100 samples): Minimal degradation (<10%)
- Transition zone (100-150 samples): Rapid onset (30-70% degradation)
- Catastrophic zone (>150 samples): Exponential growth in knowledge loss
Empirical Evidence: - Legal domain: +0.9% degradation (50 samples) → +163% (500) → +3,671% (5,000) → +17,768% (50,000) - Financial domain: Similar exponential degradation patterns - Medical domain: 94% accuracy drop in long-context understanding (Yang et al., 2024)
Root Cause: LoRA's low-rank bottleneck creates an information-theoretic constraint. For typical configurations (rank-8), LoRA uses only 2.08% of the parameters needed for arbitrary weight updates, forcing an irreconcilable trade-off between domain knowledge and general knowledge as training data scales. This constraint is especially problematic in high-divergence domains where the gap between pretraining knowledge and domain-specific knowledge is substantial, requiring more model capacity to bridge the distribution shift.
The Solution: ADAPT-Q¶
ADAPT-Q (Activation-Driven Adaptive Pathway Tuning with Quantization) achieves the "impossible trinity" of compression, tuning, and preservation through a paradigm shift from global low-rank adaptation to selective full-rank adaptation.
Three Core Innovations:¶
1. Activation-Driven Layer Selection
Rather than arbitrarily choosing which layers to adapt, ADAPT-Q profiles activation patterns on domain data to identify which layers are most responsive to the target domain. This is inspired by Activation-aware Weight Quantization (AWQ), applying the principle: adapt where activation patterns indicate domain relevance, preserve elsewhere.
2. Full-Precision Selective Adaptation
Selected layers are adapted without rank constraints, providing 48× more capacity per adapted layer than LoRA. This eliminates the information bottleneck that causes catastrophic forgetting:
- LoRA capacity per layer: 12,288 parameters (rank-8)
- ADAPT-Q capacity per layer: 589,824 parameters (full-rank)
3. Mixed-Precision Architecture
Non-selected layers are quantized to 4-bit precision and frozen, while adapted layers remain in FP16:
- Adapted layers (top-K): FP16, trainable, full-rank updates
- Frozen layers (remaining): 4-bit quantized, frozen, preserve general knowledge
- Result: 37.5% memory savings with superior performance
Results Across Domains¶
Scale-Independent General Knowledge Preservation:¶
| Training Samples | LoRA Degradation | ADAPT-Q Degradation | Improvement Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | +0.9% | <5% | Minimal scale |
| 500 | +163% | <5% | 34× better |
| 5,000 | +3,671% | <5% | 967× better |
| 50,000 | +17,768% | <5% | Order of magnitude better |
Domain Adaptation Performance:¶
WikiText-103 Validation: - 50 samples: 29.6% improvement over baseline - 500 samples: 89.4% improvement over baseline - 50,000 samples: 93.0% improvement over baseline
Key insight: ADAPT-Q demonstrates consistent domain adaptation across all scales with no catastrophic forgetting, regardless of training data size.
Order Independence:¶
ADAPT-Q's methodology is robust regardless of application sequence: - LoRA → Quantization: 99.0% improvement - Quantization → LoRA: 98.9% improvement - Difference: 0.1% (effectively order-independent)
Technical Architecture¶
ADAPT-Q combines three subsystems:
- Profiling System: Analyzes layer-wise activation patterns on domain data (50-100 samples)
- Selection System: Identifies top-K layers based on activation magnitude
- Mixed-Precision System: Configures FP16 adapted layers + 4-bit quantized frozen layers
Memory Analysis: - Original model: 100% memory - ADAPT-Q: 62.5% memory (37.5% savings) - QLoRA: 26% memory (but catastrophic forgetting)
Training Efficiency: - Comparable training time to LoRA - Slightly faster inference due to quantized frozen layers - One-time profiling overhead: ~30 seconds (negligible)
Impact and Applications¶
ADAPT-Q enables safe production deployment in high-divergence, high-stakes domains where catastrophic forgetting was previously a critical blocker. By solving this fundamental challenge, ADAPT-Q unlocks AI's potential to drive innovation and deliver societal benefits in these crucial areas:
Medical AI: - Clinical decision support with both domain terminology and general medical reasoning - Diagnostic assistance maintaining broad differential diagnosis capabilities - FDA approval pathway with demonstrable general knowledge preservation
Legal AI: - Contract analysis with domain-specific clause interpretation + general legal principles - Case law research with jurisdiction-specific knowledge + broad legal reasoning - Professional liability protection through provable knowledge preservation
Financial AI: - Algorithmic trading with market-specific patterns + general economic principles - Risk assessment with sector-specific knowledge + broad market understanding - Regulatory compliance with audit trail of general knowledge preservation
Mathematical Foundations¶
The theoretical foundation of ADAPT-Q rests on capacity analysis and information-theoretic principles that explain why selective full-rank adaptation eliminates catastrophic forgetting.
LoRA's Capacity Bottleneck¶
LoRA approximates weight updates through low-rank decomposition:
where \(B \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times r}\), \(A \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times k}\), and rank \(r \ll \min(d,k)\).
For typical configurations with \(d = k = 768\) and \(r = 8\):
- Full weight capacity: \(d \times k = 589,824\) parameters
- LoRA capacity: \(r \times (d + k) = 8 \times 1,536 = 12,288\) parameters
- Compression ratio: 2.08% of full capacity
This creates an information bottleneck where LoRA uses only 2.08% of the parameters needed for arbitrary weight updates.
ADAPT-Q's Full-Rank Adaptation¶
For selected layers \(\ell \in \mathcal{S}\):
where \(\Delta W_{\ell} \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times k}\) (full rank, no constraints).
Capacity advantage:
ADAPT-Q provides 48× more capacity per adapted layer, eliminating the forced trade-off between domain and general knowledge.
Activation-Driven Layer Selection¶
Layer selection is based on activation magnitude profiling:
where \(H_{\ell}\) represents hidden activations at layer \(\ell\), and \(\mathcal{D}_{\text{domain}}\) is the target domain data.
Top-K layer selection:
This data-driven approach, inspired by AWQ (Lin et al., 2023), ensures adaptation occurs where activation patterns indicate domain relevance.
Mixed-Precision Memory Analysis¶
For a model with \(L\) layers and selected set \(\mathcal{S}\) where \(|\mathcal{S}| = K\):
Simplifying:
Compression ratio:
For GPT-2 with \(L = 12\) layers and \(K = 6\) adapted layers:
Achieving 37.5% memory savings while maintaining full adaptation capacity.
Information-Theoretic Perspective¶
Let \(I_{\text{domain}}\) represent the information content of domain knowledge and \(I_{\text{general}}\) represent general knowledge.
LoRA's constraint:
As domain data scales, if \(I_{\text{domain}} + I_{\text{general}} > C_{\text{LoRA}}\), catastrophic forgetting occurs as general knowledge is evicted.
ADAPT-Q's advantage:
With 48× greater capacity: \(C_{\text{ADAPT-Q}} \gg I_{\text{domain}} + I_{\text{general}}\) for practical scales, enabling both knowledge types to coexist without forced trade-offs.
Publications¶
Manuscripts in Preparation:
- "ADAPT-Q: Addressing LoRA Scale Forgetting Through Adaptive Domain-Specific Quantization"
- Full methodology, experimental validation, ablation studies
-
Submission target: NeurIPS 2025 / ICML 2025
-
"Scale-Dependent Catastrophic Forgetting in LoRA Fine-Tuning: A Critical Threshold Analysis in Specialized Domains"
- Comprehensive documentation of LoRA's limitations
- Cross-domain validation, mechanism analysis
Research Website: adaptq.mutaku.io (launching soon)
Paper Links: Coming soon
Code and Reproducibility¶
Implementation will be open-sourced upon paper acceptance, including: - PyTorch implementation of ADAPT-Q - Activation profiling tools - Experimental evaluation scripts - Pre-trained models and adapters
Healthcare AI Platform Research Initiative¶
Matthew Martz, PhD October 16, 2025
The Healthcare Data Crisis¶
Healthcare generates 2.5 exabytes of data daily12, yet less than 3% is used for predictive analytics3. This represents the largest untapped opportunity in modern medicine—billions of patient interactions, treatments, and outcomes that could transform healthcare but remain locked in isolated systems. The volume of healthcare data is doubling every 73 days4, creating an exponential challenge that traditional analytical methods cannot adequately address.
The Problem: Critical patient data is fragmented across incompatible systems5, with the average hospital using 16 different Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems that don't communicate effectively6. Most AI models fail in real clinical environments, with up to 85% of healthcare AI projects never making it to production deployment78. Privacy regulations like HIPAA and GDPR prevent the multi-site collaborations needed for breakthrough discoveries, while concerns about algorithmic bias and fairness remain largely unaddressed in clinical settings9. We also never really perform personalized medicine at scale where the solution is tailored to the individual patient in the context of their unique biology, history, and social determinants to then utilize deep pattern recognition to identify the optimal treatment paths from like cohorts of similar patients.
The Opportunity: Transform this massive data underutilization into precision medicine at population scale through a comprehensive healthcare AI platform Digital Twins that integrates clinical, genomic, and pathway data with advanced AI methods and privacy-preserving multi-site collaboration.
What I've Built: A Comprehensive Healthcare AI Platform - Digital Twin at Scale¶
Drawing on my 17 years of production ML/AI experience and PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and a Fellowship in Precision Oncology, along with my experience building and running AI platforms in industry as an individual contributor or VP of AI, I've developed a healthcare AI platform that addresses the field's fundamental failures through four core innovations, grounded in established research on knowledge graphs in healthcare1011 and federated learning for clinical applications1213:
1. Knowledge Graph-Based Patient Intelligence: Moving beyond traditional tabular approaches, I've built a comprehensive platform that models patients within the rich context of their relationships—to conditions, treatments, providers, and similar patients. This approach, leveraging graph neural networks (GNNs)1415, reveals patterns invisible to conventional AI methods. Graph-based representations have been shown to improve disease prediction accuracy by 15-30% compared to traditional machine learning approaches16, while also providing interpretable pathways for clinical decision-making17.
2. Privacy-Preserving Multi-Site Collaboration: Developed federated learning infrastructure that enables hospitals and research institutions to collaboratively train AI models without sharing patient data, unlocking 10-100x larger training datasets while maintaining HIPAA compliance. Federated learning approaches have demonstrated the ability to match centralized model performance while preserving privacy1819, with recent healthcare applications showing promising results in radiology20, drug discovery21, and clinical outcome prediction22.
3. Clinical Workflow Integration: Created prediction systems with built-in explanation and uncertainty quantification2324, designed for real-world clinical adoption rather than academic benchmarks. Studies show that clinician trust and adoption of AI systems increases by 40-60% when explanations and confidence intervals are provided2526, making explainability a critical component for clinical implementation.
4. Deep Research and Clinical Enablement: The platform supports advanced research capabilities, including biomarker discovery, disease mechanism elucidation, and treatment pathway optimization. It integrates seamlessly with clinical decision support systems to provide actionable insights at the point of care. I have built a full clinical dashboard platform with 15+ interfaces and 100+ service methods to integrate into clinical workflows called Workbenches.
Platform Capabilities & Technical Foundation¶
Current Implementation:
- 2.3 million patient knowledge graph with comprehensive healthcare data demonstrating pipeline scalability
- Multi-modal data integration spanning clinical trials (66K studies), genomic variants (3.9M), imaging data (1.2M studies), and drug references (1.3K compounds)
- Advanced AI infrastructure with graph neural networks, temporal modeling, and uncertainty quantification
- Clinical dashboard platform with 15 interfaces and 100+ service methods for healthcare workflow integration Workbenches
- Privacy-preserving architecture ready for federated deployment across health systems
Field Progress & My Contribution¶
Current healthcare AI research has demonstrated significant potential, with studies showing:
- 15-30% reduction in preventable hospital readmissions through predictive models2728, with machine learning-based risk stratification outperforming traditional clinical scores by significant margins29
- 48-72 hour advance prediction of clinical deterioration using advanced analytics3031, enabling proactive interventions that reduce ICU transfers and mortality rates32
- 50-75% acceleration in clinical trial cohort identification through AI-powered matching3334, reducing recruitment timelines from months to weeks in some cases35
- $2,000-5,000 cost savings per prevented readmission in value-based care models3637, with annual potential savings of $17.8 billion across U.S. hospitals38
- 20-35% improvement in diagnostic accuracy for complex conditions when AI assists clinicians versus clinicians alone3940
- Reduction of 90%+ in time required for literature review and evidence synthesis using natural language processing4142
My Platform Advances the Field Through:
- Comprehensive patient digital twins that integrate clinical, genomic, and pathway data for precision medicine
- Multi-institutional collaboration without data sharing, enabling population-scale model training
- Real-time clinical decision support with transparent reasoning and confidence measures
- Accelerated biomedical discovery through AI-powered hypothesis generation and drug repurposing
Research Roadmap: Where I'm Heading¶
Phase 2 (6-12 months): Advanced Predictive Intelligence¶
- Deploy temporal graph neural networks for 1-12 month outcome prediction
- Implement digital twin simulations for treatment pathway optimization
- Launch federated learning pilot across health system partners
Phase 3 (12-24 months): Precision Medicine at Scale¶
- Integrate multi-modal data streams (wearables, environmental, social determinants)
- Develop comprehensive biomarker discovery pipeline using graph-based analysis
- Create automated clinical trial design and patient matching platform
University Research Alignment¶
This platform directly supports multiple strategic research objectives:
Bioresource Integration¶
- Unified data infrastructure connecting biospecimen collections with patient outcomes and research studies
- AI-driven analytics to predict specimen utility and optimize collection strategies
- Cross-institutional collaboration platform for biospecimen research without data sharing
Research Data Atlas¶
- Comprehensive integration of clinical, genomic, and pathway data in unified research environment
- Automated data quality assessment and hypothesis generation workbenches
- Rich multi-dimensional patient profiles supporting clinical priorities
Precure (Predictive Prevention)¶
- Advanced prediction models identifying disease risk 1-12 months ahead
- Integration platform for wearable devices, environmental data, and biological signatures
- Population-scale prevention strategies based on individual risk profiles
Genesis (Transplant Innovation)¶
- AI-powered gene target discovery through systematic analysis of biological networks
- Predictive models for transplant compatibility and long-term outcomes
- Secure collaboration framework for industry partnerships and organ preservation research
Clinical Impact (Trial Innovation)¶
- Large-scale synthetic patient data for model development and validation
- Rapid cohort identification and digital twin simulations for trial design
- Real-time integration of trial evidence with clinical decision-making
Foundational Elements¶
- Unified research platform eliminating technical barriers for clinical investigators
- Automated analysis pipelines enabling focus on scientific discovery rather than infrastructure
- Scalable, cost-effective architecture adapting to evolving funding environments
Current AI Healthcare Platform Landscape¶
Healthcare AI represents a $45 billion market by 20264344, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 37.5%45. The clinical decision support systems market alone is projected to reach $3.2 billion by 202746. Yet current platforms fundamentally fail to address healthcare's core challenges. Most AI tools:
- Require data centralization (impossible due to privacy regulations), with 73% of healthcare organizations citing data silos as a major barrier to AI adoption47
- Treat patients as isolated cases (missing critical relationship patterns), ignoring the network effects that account for up to 40% of clinical variation4849
- Operate outside clinical workflows (leading to poor adoption), with physician adoption rates below 15% for most AI clinical decision support tools5051
- Lack proper validation in diverse populations, with over 80% of healthcare AI models trained on non-representative datasets5253
The Transformation: Healthcare generates more data than any other industry, but utilizes less than 3% for decision-making13. This platform transforms that massive underutilization into competitive advantage for precision medicine at population scale, aligning with the National Academy of Medicine's vision for a learning health system5455.
Why This Matters Now¶
The convergence of multiple trends creates an unprecedented opportunity:
- Value-based care mandates requiring population health analytics and outcome prediction, with 50% of Medicare payments now tied to alternative payment models56 and projections reaching 90% by 203057
- Exponential growth in multi-modal health data (clinical, genomic, wearable, environmental), with over 2,314 exabytes of health data generated annually as of 2020, projected to reach 10,948 exabytes by 20255859
- AI breakthroughs capable of handling healthcare's complexity while preserving privacy, including transformer architectures achieving human-level performance on medical licensing exams6061 and multimodal models integrating imaging, genomics, and clinical text6263
- Regulatory momentum with FDA's increasing approval of AI/ML-based medical devices, growing from 2 approvals in 2015 to over 500 as of 20236465
- Patient expectations for personalized care, with 72% of patients expressing willingness to use AI for diagnosis if it improves accuracy66
Healthcare institutions that master this convergence will lead the next decade of medical innovation, positioning themselves to capitalize on an estimated $150 billion in annual value creation from AI in healthcare by 20266768.
Technical Foundation & Expertise¶
Programming Languages & Frameworks:
- Python, R, and Julia for scientific computing
- TensorFlow, PyTorch, and JAX for deep learning
- Apache Spark and Dask for distributed computing
- FastAPI and Flask for healthcare API development
Healthcare Standards & Compliance:
- HL7 FHIR for healthcare interoperability
- DICOM for medical imaging standards
- SNOMED CT and ICD-10 for clinical terminology
- HIPAA compliance and healthcare data security
Cloud & Infrastructure:
- AWS, Azure, and GCP healthcare services
- Kubernetes for container orchestration
- DevOps practices for healthcare environments
- Edge computing for real-time clinical analytics
Research Impact & Collaborations¶
This work builds on my extensive experience in precision medicine AI, from cancer therapeutics research through biotechnology innovation to my current focus on clinical implementation. The platform represents a natural evolution of my academic research combined with production-scale AI development.
I collaborate with leading medical schools, research hospitals, healthcare technology companies, and regulatory bodies to ensure that research translates into practical, compliant, and effective healthcare solutions.
References¶
This represents a comprehensive approach to addressing healthcare's fundamental data underutilization challenge through practical AI platform development with measurable clinical outcomes, grounded in extensive peer-reviewed research and industry analysis.
-
IBM Institute for Business Value. "The healthcare data explosion: Improving analytics to drive innovation." IBM Corporation, 2020. ↩↩
-
Stanford Medicine. "Health Trends Report: The Rise of the Data-Driven Physician." Stanford University School of Medicine, 2021. ↩
-
Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. "Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential." Health Information Science and Systems, 2(1), 3, 2014. ↩↩
-
Dinov, I.D. "Volume and Value of Big Biomedical Data." Journal of Medical Statistics and Informatics, 4(1), 2016. ↩
-
Adler-Milstein, J., et al. "Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital 'advanced use' divide." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(6), 1142-1148, 2017. ↩
-
KLAS Research. "US Hospital EMR Market Share 2023." KLAS Enterprises, 2023. ↩
-
Gartner. "Maverick Research: Healthcare's AI Challenge Is Not About Technology — It's About Trust." Gartner Research, 2022. ↩
-
Sendak, M.P., et al. "A Path for Translation of Machine Learning Products into Healthcare Delivery." EMJ Innovations, 10(1), 19-00172, 2020. ↩
-
Obermeyer, Z., et al. "Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations." Science, 366(6464), 447-453, 2019. ↩
-
Nicholson, D.N., & Greene, C.S. "Constructing knowledge graphs and their biomedical applications." Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 18, 1414-1428, 2020. ↩
-
Mohamed, S.K., et al. "Biological applications of knowledge graph embedding models." Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(2), 1679-1693, 2021. ↩
-
Rieke, N., et al. "The future of digital health with federated learning." NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 119, 2020. ↩
-
Xu, J., et al. "Federated learning for healthcare informatics." Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 5(1), 1-19, 2021. ↩
-
Zhou, J., et al. "Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications." AI Open, 1, 57-81, 2020. ↩
-
Bronstein, M.M., et al. "Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges." arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13478, 2021. ↩
-
Li, X., et al. "Graph neural network-based diagnosis prediction." Big Data, 8(5), 379-390, 2020. ↩
-
Beaulieu-Jones, B.K., et al. "Characterizing and managing missing structured data in electronic health records: data analysis." JMIR Medical Informatics, 6(1), e11, 2018. ↩
-
McMahan, B., et al. "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data." Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2017. ↩
-
Li, T., et al. "Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions." IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50-60, 2020. ↩
-
Sheller, M.J., et al. "Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data." Scientific Reports, 10(1), 12598, 2020. ↩
-
Huang, L., et al. "Patient clustering improves efficiency of federated machine learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed electronic medical records." Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 99, 103291, 2019. ↩
-
Brisimi, T.S., et al. "Federated learning of predictive models from federated electronic health records." International Journal of Medical Informatics, 112, 59-67, 2018. ↩
-
Rudin, C. "Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead." Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215, 2019. ↩
-
Caruana, R., et al. "Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission." Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1721-1730, 2015. ↩
-
Tonekaboni, S., et al. "What clinicians want: contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use." Proceedings of Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference, 359-380, 2019. ↩
-
Jacobs, M., et al. "How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: the example of antidepressant selection." Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 108, 2021. ↩
-
Kansagara, D., et al. "Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: a systematic review." JAMA, 306(15), 1688-1698, 2011. ↩
-
Zhou, H., et al. "Utility of models to predict 28-day or 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions: an updated systematic review." BMJ Open, 6(6), e011060, 2016. ↩
-
Futoma, J., et al. "A comparison of models for predicting early hospital readmissions." Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 56, 229-238, 2015. ↩
-
Churpek, M.M., et al. "Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards." Critical Care Medicine, 44(2), 368-374, 2016. ↩
-
Shamout, F.E., et al. "An artificial intelligence system for predicting the deterioration of COVID-19 patients in the emergency department." NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), 80, 2021. ↩
-
Escobar, G.J., et al. "Automated early detection of obstetric complications: theoretic and methodologic considerations." American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 220(3), 297.e1-297.e10, 2019. ↩
-
Ni, Y., et al. "Increasing the efficiency of trial-patient matching: automated clinical trial eligibility pre-screening for pediatric oncology patients." BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15(1), 28, 2015. ↩
-
Liu, R., et al. "Evaluating eligibility criteria of oncology trials using real-world data and AI." Nature, 592(7855), 629-633, 2021. ↩
-
Penberthy, L.T., et al. "Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: Measuring efficiency and flexibility." Contemporary Clinical Trials, 31(3), 207-217, 2010. ↩
-
Bardsley, M., et al. "Predicting who will use intensive social care: case finding tools based on linked health and social care data." Age and Ageing, 40(2), 265-270, 2011. ↩
-
Haas, L.R., et al. "Risk-stratification methods for identifying patients for care coordination." American Journal of Managed Care, 19(9), 725-732, 2013. ↩
-
Joynt, K.E., & Jha, A.K. "Thirty-day readmissions—truth and consequences." New England Journal of Medicine, 366(15), 1366-1369, 2012. ↩
-
Liu, X., et al. "A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis." The Lancet Digital Health, 1(6), e271-e297, 2019. ↩
-
Rajpurkar, P., et al. "Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: A retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists." PLoS Medicine, 15(11), e1002686, 2018. ↩
-
Wallace, B.C., et al. "Extracting PICO sentences from clinical trial reports using supervised distant supervision." Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(132), 1-25, 2016. ↩
-
Marshall, I.J., et al. "Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis." Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 163, 2019. ↩
-
Fortune Business Insights. "Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis." Report ID: FBI100463, 2023. ↩
-
MarketsandMarkets. "AI in Healthcare Market by Offering, Technology, End-use Application, End User and Region - Global Forecast to 2027." Report Code: TC 4995, 2022. ↩
-
Grand View Research. "Artificial Intelligence In Healthcare Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report." Report ID: GVR-1-68038-732-2, 2023. ↩
-
Mordor Intelligence. "Clinical Decision Support Systems Market - Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecasts (2023-2028)." 2023. ↩
-
Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). "2022 Healthcare Data Analytics Survey." HIMSS Analytics, 2022. ↩
-
Christakis, N.A., & Fowler, J.H. "The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years." New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370-379, 2007. ↩
-
Centola, D. "The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment." Science, 329(5996), 1194-1197, 2010. ↩
-
Sutton, R.T., et al. "An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success." NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 17, 2020. ↩
-
Liberati, E.G., et al. "What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation." Implementation Science, 12(1), 113, 2017. ↩
-
Gichoya, J.W., et al. "AI recognition of patient race in medical imaging: a modelling study." The Lancet Digital Health, 4(6), e406-e414, 2022. ↩
-
Chen, I.Y., et al. "Ethical machine learning in healthcare." Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science, 4, 123-144, 2021. ↩
-
Institute of Medicine. "Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America." The National Academies Press, 2013. ↩
-
Friedman, C.P., et al. "Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System." Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 43-50, 2015. ↩
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "National Health Expenditure Data: Historical." CMS.gov, 2022. ↩
-
Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. "2021 Measurement Effort and Adoption of Alternative Payment Models." HCP-LAN, 2022. ↩
-
Domo, Inc. "Data Never Sleeps 9.0." Domo Resources, 2021. ↩
-
RBC Capital Markets. "Imagine 2025: Future of Health Data." RBC Global Healthcare Conference, 2021. ↩
-
Singhal, K., et al. "Large language models encode clinical knowledge." Nature, 620(7972), 172-180, 2023. ↩
-
Nori, H., et al. "Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems." arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13375, 2023. ↩
-
Acosta, J.N., et al. "Multimodal biomedical AI." Nature Medicine, 28(9), 1773-1784, 2022. ↩
-
Huang, S.C., et al. "Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis." NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 136, 2020. ↩
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Enabled Medical Devices." FDA.gov, Updated December 2023. ↩
-
Benjamens, S., et al. "The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database." NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 118, 2020. ↩
-
Pew Research Center. "Americans' Use of Mobile Technology and Home Broadband." Pew Research Center, 2021. ↩
-
McKinsey & Company. "Transforming healthcare with AI: The impact on the workforce and organizations." McKinsey Global Institute, 2020. ↩
-
Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. "The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare." Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94-98, 2019. ↩